Disparate Impact/Disparate Treatment

Disparate impact happens when an employer uses a facially neutral employ handst utilize that has an adverse impact on members of a protected class. If the electronegative impact affects the protected group more harshly than the volume group, discrimination may be found. Practices that may be considered antiblack are placement tests, aptitude tests, height and weight requirements or any other screening device that causes more than 20 pct of a protected group to fail the test. For example, snow men and 100 women take an exam for a promotion. 90 of the women pass the test but only 45 of the men pass the test. The relevant ratio would be 45/90, or 50 percent, which would violate the 80 percent rule. Because the men did non pass at a rate of 80 percent of the women, the test is considered to have a disparate impact on men.

The plaintiff mustiness prove, usually with statistical data, that the challenged approach pattern has an adverse impact on a protected group. The employer must prove that the challenged practice is a stage business necessity. Even if the employer proves business necessity, if an alternate employment practice that does not have the very(prenominal) effect on the minority group is available, the employer is still shamed of disparate impact. GRIGGS v. DUKE POWER CO., 401 U.S. 424 (1971) 401 U.S.



424 is the most famous court lawsuit dealing with disparate impact. Griggs was codified into law in 1991 through the Civil Rights Act of 1991.

In Griggs v. Duke Power Co. African American employees challenged Duke Powers policies requiring a high school diploma or passing of intuition tests as a condition of employment in or transfer to jobs at the plant. These requirements went into effect right after the departure of Title VII. Before Title VII, all non-white...

If you want to hold back a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .