J. Dwight Pentecost's Things to Come: A Study in Biblical Eschatology

His first chapter deals with methods of recital, the two basal angiotensin-converting enzymes being allegorical and literal, and he comes down firmly on the side of the literal. This is not too surprising. These days, not even tolerant theologians could use seriously the classic forms of allegorical variation; so all confine in that sense become literalists. Pentecost as well makes clear that by "literal" he, at least, means zero more or less than the primary meaning and ordinary, common land-sense interpretation of the words on the page of the Bible.

In his third chapter, he deals with another(prenominal) types of interpretation, for example: historical, which interprets a word, phrase, or sentence in light of what it meant or referred to at the time it was written; and grammatical, which may, among other things, analyze the grammatical structure of the Greek text basis the English words. He also discusses the problem of figurative language, which Evangelicals ar often accused of interpreting "literally" by free-hearted Christians. He exposes this merchant shipard for the nonsense it is, and goes on to lay down guidelines for determine when Biblical language is literal or figurative. He makes the berth that all too often a passage has been tell figurative when a perfectly sound literal interpretation of it is available.

In Chapter IV, the last in the opening section, he lays extinct world-wide guidelines for how to interpret Biblical prophecies. First he discusses the general characteristics of prop

hecy, and then surveys the methods of prophetic revelation, which can be through types, symbols, parables, dreams, or ecstasies. He then sets forward his rules for interpreting foretelling, which are that one should: observe the perspective of prophecy and the time dealingships; and interpret literally, according to the harmony of prophecy, Christologically, historically, grammatically, according to the legality of double reference, and consistently.

Indeed, almost all of his rules appear to be matters of common sense, except for the law of double reference, which holds that a prophecy may have more than one focus; that is, it may have been about an event in the past, and to that extent be carry through, and tho may also be about an event that lies let off in the future, and thus in that sense also be unfulfilled.

Pentecost, J. Dwight. Things to Come: A Study in Biblical Eschatology. desperate Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1958.

In this section he also deals with the actually live problem of the relationship between the zeal and the Tribulation, that is, of whether the Rapture will occur before, during, or after the Tribulation. He devotes a chapter to each of these three positions, and another to the partial Rapture theory, in order to set out the arguments for and against them. It is clear from the length of Chapter XIII, the one on the pretribulation position, and from the structure of the book that Pentecost belongs to the pretribulation school. In Chapter XIV he explains the two major events that will follow the Rapture: the sound judgment by Christ, and the marriage of the Lamb.

In the next section of his book, Pentecost turns to exploring the relations between the Biblical covenants and eschatology. He distinguishes four covenants: the Abrahamic, Palestinian, Davidic, and New (that is, Christian). The questions he is asking here are: to what extent are these eternal covenants; to what extent have they been fulfilled; and what remains to be fulfilled in the future? In d
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.