Goals of NOW and SNCC

To that end, SNCC has (as has now) worked to improve voter registration, use protest as a means of highlighting iniquity and initiating a call for action, created and pursued legislative and judicial change, and challenged mainstream American society to recognize the causes and effects of oppression.

SNCC has advanced the cause of accomplished rights in the join States and in conjunction with groups such as the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), mounted an effective charm to rid the country of what bell hooks (1994) has called color clan systems that impose de facto colonialism on African-Americans and other people of color. Similarly, NOW has desire to put an end to sexism as sexism has been institutionalized in the United Sates in the form of barriers to the advance manpowert of women in education and in the workplace (Freeman, 2004). What this suggests to me is that there ar very natural synergies amid the overarching goals and objectives surrounded by SNCC and NOW which should be far more cause than some of the tensions and conflicts that others deplete observed when these two groups are compared.

These tensions have been addressed in part by Carla Freccero (1999), who argued that some filthy ignition movements have given scant attention to sexism in their emphasis on the very real injustices suffered by blacks as a group and, in particular, by black men who have been the victims of violence and brutal

chime hooks (1994) made the case that many of the black liberation movements have marginalized women and their contributions in their efforts to improve the quality of life enjoyed by black men. Hooks (1994) went take down farther and suggested that there are tensions and hostilities within black culture that pit men against women and which whitethorn by extension, make it difficult for groups such as SNCC to get in with groups such as NOW in advancing civic rights to include issues of sexuality and sexism as well as racism.

Morrison, T. (1993). The Bluest Eye. newly York: Plume.

ity at the hands of mainstream white society.

Freeman (2004) makes it clear that NOW as well stands in staunch opposition to any savageness meted out against individuals on the basis of skin color.

Unfortunately, the distance which has emerged between NOW and SNCC has served to promote the agenda of Neoconservatives such as blast Limbaugh (Hardisty, 1999). Rather than making common cause, rights groups like SNCC and NOW that do not work together simply (if inadvertently) permit the raw(a) Right to maintain policies that are unjust and unfair. This is an unfortunate and even tragic situation and one which could certainly be catch were our organizations to come together in common cause.

Hooks (1994) also says that we must eliminate celebrations of rape and to eliminate the hegemonic control exerted by a phallocentric patriarchal state. Hooks (1994) suggests that we must begin to do sex in a way that eliminates using gender as a means of defining power or granting power to individuals. This of course represents a difficult challenge for the vast majority of people who havd been socialized to accept specific gender stereotypes as valid.

Hardisty, J. (1999). Mobilizing Resentment. Boston:

For SNCC, taking up the gauntlet of women's rights is a natural progression. Many women (including white women such as Connie Brown) embraced SNCC and fall in in SNCC's activities and prote
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.