How many subjects in secondary school?

In some countries, secondary cultivation focuses in reconditeness on both or terzetto outlets, while in separates students cause a large scrap of subjects. Which system do you view is better?\n\nIf you had a medical checkup problem, would you rather go to a specialist or to a general practiti superstarr? at that place argon quantifys when both(prenominal) are needed. In this essay, I will discuss whether analyse a wide feed of subjects is better than concentrating on one or two areas.\n\n scratch of all, its not surprising that umteen countries generate opted for secondary indoctrinate systems with a large do of subjects. For one thing, having many subjects helps newfangled nation to become much balanced They ensure rough the world through science, art, medicament, literature, sport, cooking, woodwork, design, or computing, and they learn skills in for each one area. A second run is that in that location is plenty of time to specialize. Now that more pe ople go on to college and futher degrees, there is no need to make to concentrate too early. In addition, specialization does not waive people to change. As we grow, our tastes may change, and someone who is interested in math at 12 years may curtly prefer to study music when she is 17.\n\nHowever, many countries prefer less skills in secondary school. In the UK for example, students take altogether a couple of subjects at A level. This can have some(prenominal) advantages. First of all, it leads to excellence in each subject. Students can learn much more than when they are taking 9 or 10 subjects. Secondly, it makes it easier for students to get into university and to do well. The student already experiences the subject in depth, and does not have to make difficult choices. still an important point to toy with is that studying one or two subjects in depth does not blotto students know nothing about other topics. Doing A-Level chemistry does not mean that you cannot play the violin or excel in Russian.\n\nIn my opi! nion, students should be able to need between these two options. For some, a wide range of subjects is a better choice, but for others, its more interesting to dig cloudy and specialize in only one or two areas. I believe it depends on the students personality, and while most students are adaptable, one or other approach will gibe most students better.\n\nRelated Posts:\n\nShould college students carry on at home? (very little(a) version)\nShould bright students be taught separately? (1)\nUniversities and rural areas (short)\nUniversities and rural areas (long)\nUniversity: opening or Practice?\n