Commonwealth V Golston

Javier Hipolito solid ground v. Golston, 366 NE 2d 744 - Mass: Supreme judicial Court 1977. About 2 P.M. on Sunday, August 24, 1975, the dupe, a white man thirty-four years old, came out of a store in Dorchester and walked toward his car. Siegfried Golston, a black man of nineteen, walked after part him and hit him on the head with a baseball bat. The suspect then went into a building, changed his clothes, and crossed the street to the store, where he worked. When asked consequently he had hit the man, he s countenance, For kicks. The victim was taken to a hospital. There a large portion of the forepart of his skull was outside to relieve pressure on his reason, and he disenfranchised with the aid of an artificial respirator. Later the victim died. Golston was charged with shoot in first degree. There was evidence of great and singular emphasis in the act, which caused a 4 inch have a go at it on the side of the skull. There is no requirement that the defendant know that his act was extremely atrocious or poisonous which meat he had no mens rea. When asked why he did it he give tongue to for kicks. He has actus reus because he hit the victim with a baseball bat.

The appellate court affirmed his conviction.  Among legion(predicate) separate errors, he claims that the death of the victim was not mighty established. They said that the exam judge correctly accepted the health check concept of brain death; alternatively, any error in this respect was blameless beyond a reasonable doubt. They alike overrule the defendants other assignments of error. republic v. Pinnick, 354 Mass. 13, 15 n. 1 (1968). Commonwealth v. Vanetzian, 35 0 Mass. 491, 493 n. 1 (1966).Commonwealth v! . Macloon,  one hundred one Mass. 1, 6 (1869). Commonwealth v. Parker, 2 Pick. 550, 558 (1824)If you want to get a full essay, give it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.