Assisted Suicide, mercy killing, euthanasia; whatever you call it or only we justified it is killing by all means. Euthanasia is a practice of ending a life to release an singular from an incurable disease or intolerable suffering. It is an action which brings intended death to a uncomplaining. In the case of the elderly genus Cancer patient, the family and the patient does non know whether or not to localize euthanasia. The author response in this case, is that the elderly cancer patient should not go for euthanasia, since she has a biographical life. He came to the powerful conclusion, even though he did not have a valid argument. The author should have advised the patient not to commit euthanasia by using the three master(prenominal) arguments against euthanasia, which are the Bible from a Christian prospective, the effective distress management, and the fear of abuse if euthanasia were legalized.
Case History: A 70 one-year-old Christian woman developed cancer in her kidney. Physicians helped her by removing the kidney. However, now the cancer has spread to other parts of her body. The physicians enounce that she needs dialysis, since her second kidney is now failing. They believe that dialysis might reserve her alive for six to nine months. Without dialysis, she would probably survive a couple of weeks.
An experimental drug that might have nearly effect on her cancer is coming onto the market. The new drug might help her fight the cancer, if she could survive for six months. in spite of her insurance policy, she is sending a tremendous amount of silver from her life savings. Her son thinks death is unavoidable and wants to avoid dialysis. He thinks bankrupting the family for a long shot is meaningless. Her daughter is a Christian who feels bad about not doing everything she...
If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.
No comments:
Post a Comment